NutriAudit
Back to Home

How NutriAudit Calculates Safety Scores

NutriAudit Safety Scores are calculated from two weighted components: overdose risk assessment (60%) and ingredient interaction analysis (40%), based on Tolerable Upper Intake Levels from five regional health authorities.

Score Overview

Each supplement stack receives a safety score from 0 to 100. A score of 100 means no overdose risks or harmful interactions detected. Higher scores indicate safer stacks.

60%

Overdose Risk Assessment

Checks whether total intake of each ingredient exceeds Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (ULs)

40%

Ingredient Interaction Analysis

Detects absorption conflicts, competition, and ratio imbalances between ingredient pairs

Overdose Risk Calculation

NutriAudit uses a dynamic deduction curve rather than fixed thresholds, more accurately reflecting safety risk at different intake levels. The deduction curve is based on percentage of UL:

Intake Level% of ULDeduction Rule
Safe0 - 60%No deduction
Approaching limit60 - 100%Linear deduction: 0-20 points
Exceeding UL100 - 200%Exponential deduction: 20-55 points
Severe excess200 - 300%Accelerated deduction: 55-80 points
Extreme excess300%+Extreme deduction: 80-95 points (capped)

High-risk ingredients (e.g., vitamin A, iron, selenium) receive multiplied deductions (1.2-1.5x). Water-soluble vitamins (e.g., vitamin C, B-complex) have lower multipliers (0.5-0.6x). Ingredients from multiple sources receive an additional 10% deduction.

Interaction Detection

NutriAudit performs pairwise checks on all ingredients in your supplement stack, identifying three types of interaction risks:

Absorption Conflict

One ingredient significantly reduces absorption of another when taken together. Example: calcium can reduce iron absorption by up to 60%.

Mineral Competition

Structurally similar minerals compete for the same absorption pathways. Example: high-dose zinc competes with copper and iron absorption.

Synergy & Enhancement

Some ingredient combinations have positive synergistic effects, such as vitamin D enhancing calcium absorption. Beneficial interactions do not reduce the score.

Interaction scoring: high-severity interactions deduct 25 points, medium deduct 12, low deduct 5.

Five Regional Standards

NutriAudit references dietary reference intakes and tolerable upper intake levels from five major regional health authorities, covering the world's primary population regions:

RegionAuthorityExample Difference (Vitamin D UL)
United StatesFDA4,000 IU/day
European UnionEFSA4,000 IU/day
Australia/NZFSANZ4,000 IU/day
ChinaChinese Nutrition Society800 IU/day
JapanMHLW4,000 IU/day

UL values can differ by several fold across regions. For example, the Chinese Nutrition Society sets the vitamin D UL (800 IU/day) at just one-fifth of other regions (4,000 IU/day). NutriAudit defaults to EFSA standards; users can switch to their regional standard.

Authoritative Databases Cited

Limitations

  • Scores are based on general Dietary Reference Intakes and do not account for individual factors (age, weight, health conditions, genetic metabolism differences).
  • Interaction detection covers known common ingredient pairs but does not include all possible drug-supplement interactions.
  • AI label recognition may have errors. Users should verify extracted results before auditing.
  • NutriAudit is a decision-support tool, not medical advice. Consult healthcare professionals before changing your supplement regimen.

Disclaimer: NutriAudit is a decision-support tool designed to help you review your supplement stack for potential duplicate, conflicting, or excessive ingredients. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making changes to your supplement routine, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, taking medications, or have a medical condition.

Based on reference standards from FDA, EFSA, TGA, and MHLW.